--

You've written an interpretation, which is both supported and disputed across the field. Hence, in place of "no, no, no" I would substitute "maybe, maybe, maybe." Regarding an automated device, you can visit the linked Scientific American article; its authors contend that "the boundaries of a detector are arbitrary" and consciousness (itself a term without consensus) remains the ultimate determinant.

--

--

Mitch Horowitz

"Treats esoteric ideas & movements with an even-handed intellectual studiousness"-Washington Post | PEN Award-winning historian | Censored in China