That’s a willfully obtuse commentary suggesting a skim rather than a read of what I wrote. I adhere to no thought school and don’t oppose Christianity. My “bridge” is an exploration of primal myth and the esoteric history of the Satanic (exemplified by the Romantics), a belief in extra-physicality, and personal experimentation. I use the term Satan because it has historical integrity. Loyalty is not at odds with LaVeyan Satanism.